My 2030 Prediction – Tesla will be valued at $1 Trillion and will be valued for 2 key technologies that will have a significant barrier relative to others. Chemistry and Intelligence (Machine Learning). While Tesla has motors in its logo today and will continue to build motors and cars and other automotive and transportation (electric) vehicles, I see its future has less to do with electric motors or even solar as the key driver of the company core value/IP and thus its business proposition.
At the core of what Elon is building and ‘hard to do’ is battery chemistry and more interestingly is machine learning or intelligence.
Let me start with the simpler one first and the more obvious one – Chemistry.
It’s well known Tesla’s $5B factory in Nevada will be the driver of electric vehicles as we know and Elon as well as Tesla will continue to master the battery chemistry at scale for cars, trucks, home and anything anywhere that needs storage. While there are more efficient forms of energy storage, and the issue of supply of Lithium, cost of battery and efficiency growth of 5-7%/year are issues, the sheer momentum and size of market with cars and trucks will enable Tesla to have to engineer better batteries (i.e. chemistry) as it is at the core of value proposition of all electric vehicles. There are a couple of other side effects. First the oil glut will get worse and I expect it to start around 2018 and be in full swing by 2020. The big shift in the entire value chain of the internal combustion eco-system will start around the same time. We will need fewer gas stations. We will need fewer auto service shops. With Tesla model of Apple style sales going direct, it will have an impact of the overall employment workforce as well.
The second more interesting one is intelligence or machine learning or AI as its called today. We are at the Cambrian explosion era for machine intelligence or machine learning. Clearly the autonomous car is the driver for it. What is unique about Elon’s and Tesla’s approach is that the car is the best vehicle to be on the exponential curve of this technology evolution. If you consider the parallels with biological evolution, survival required better audio and later visual perception. The advent of mobility ( one of the inflection points amongst many) of the biological organisms leading to rapid evolution of the visual cortex which holds highest percentage of the brain’s volumetric space. This evolutionary growth while driven by the need for survival was a big trial and error experiment over perhaps a few billion years and out of that sensory path all kinds of decision making processes were developed.
So the assertion here is that Autonomous car is going to drive machine and deep learning tools and techniques more so than any other platform. That will include chips, platform (HW), platform (SW) and more importantly algorithms and decision processes need to meet and perhaps exceed Level 5 standards or approach a human and perhaps exceed.
Tesla has a lead on this over others including Google as they have now >100K vehicles on the road. Iterating on this and soon by 2018 going upto 500K and soon after 1M. That will be a key inflection point – analogous to the million eyeballs or developers being key for a platform success in the 1980s or 1990s (windows , mac and solaris were #1, #2 and #3 and all others dropped off), 100M for the web/social era, the same will hold for autonomous car driving the platform capability for ML/DL. Now lets contrast Tesla’s approach to Google. Tesla is taking an iterative, real world approach. Waymo i.e. Google is trying to build the best autonomous system first. We know the latter is harder and likelihood of market success is linked to multiple factors over time (except for Steve Jobs who knows how to build the perfect platform before he releases one).
So the Tesla approach is solving the hard ML/DL problems using the car as the ‘driver’, while the google approach is taking a platform (ofcourse solving Google’s other applications) approach. What’s interesting is ‘intelligence’ exploded in the biological evolution with mobility linked to survival and thus mobility became a critical ‘driver’. There are many other drivers of ‘intelligence’ but for the near term – this is a key ‘killer’ use case to drive platform evolution with significant business value.
So if we take the evolution of battery chemistry of the next 14 years and the evolution of autonomous system including the level 5 decision making system which is mobile and making real time decisions at speed and criticality of the ‘goods’ it carries, I have to posit that the core value of Tesla in 2030 will be the battery chemistry knowledge and the ML/DL platform that it will build. Behind the ML/DL platform will be silicon for processing in the car, the data (and energy) storage, the intelligence at the car level, the big data hub or data center that each car will provide and on and on and on…The Android vs iOS analogy applies. One took a platform approach to go to market and the other took a vertical integration approach.
So, while Google will drive the developer adoption of ML/DL, quietly but surely Mr Musk (and thus Tesla) could well emerge as the leader and in delivering the industry leading ML/DL platform. It won’t be restricted to just automobiles or transportation. Like biological evolution, its a winner takes all game. Homosapiens killed all other forms. Expect Tesla to drive this platform and that might well be its monetization model.
I thus speculate, It will be in the battery chemistry and the platform intelligence that will be at the core value of Tesla’s drive to a $1 Trillion in valuation by 2030.
- Status update on the predictions:
April 2019 Update: https://electrek.co/2019/05/03/tesla-tsla-value-grow-10x-500-billion-self-driving-tech-elon-musk/
Autopilot Hardware Update: https://electrek.co/2019/04/22/tesla-full-self-driving-computer-details/
3 thoughts on “Tesla – Chemistry & Intelligence”
This is great that Tesla will continue to master the battery chemistry. For me car battery is the most important car part. That’s the reason why I make sure to get my car battery checked up on regular intervals because earlier I used to face a lot of auto related problems when my battery was in bad shape.
Tesla does not work on battery chemistry. It works on battery management and uses outsourced cells or outsourced technology to make its cells.
Agreed. either they have to acquire one to retain core value as manufacturing or integration alone is not sufficient. I was expecting they either develp or acquire. If not, they will have to find another element to Justify the service. Maybe its the Tesla Network or….?